There are two genetic tests you can consider

There are two genetic tests you can consider

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

You don't have to worry about life because you lose a lot of it, but under certain circumstances it is worthwhile to have a genetic test for breast cancer and thrombosis factor.

Examination of frequent mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is among the most expensive. Anyone with such a defect may be more likely to develop breast or ovarian cancer than others. "Then would all women still have the basic interest in passing this exam?" - We made the request to our specialist.
- No, by no means! Just over a hundred percent of all cases of breast cancer are rare, but only a few percent can be associated with the mutation of either of these two genes. This means that if the test is negative, the patient will still have a slight chance that mutation in other, untested gene sequences will cause the family to move, and there will be a risk of about 10% for each woman. It is extremely dangerous if the patient is so reassured by the negative result that he / she does not require regular memory. And a positive result means that the person has a 60-80 percent chance of developing a breast. This is undoubtedly a warning that can be life-saving, as if mutations are found, they must be dealt with, for example, with much more frequent screening. Current practice is to recommend screening for mutation in the BRCA gene if there is evidence of this in the family history or in the personal history. These include cases where the patient has bilateral breast cancer, has multiple tumors, has developed forty years, has had ovarian cancer, and has had malignant malignancies. And, of course, even if one of the relatives has been shown to have BRCA1 or 2 mutations.
Warns of the risk of thrombosis
Thrombosis is said to occur when there is a blood somewhere in the coat, which blocks the flow of blood and can lead to serious events. Depending on which part of our body comes into play and how quickly we can act on the cause, it can be fatal. Post-operative, during pregnancy, the risk for women of childbearing is increased - but not the same for everyone. It has been found that thrombosis can be influenced by a variety of gene mutations, most commonly the so-called L-factor V mutation. The knowledge of genetic factors suggesting an increased risk of developing thrombotic thrombosis is important because we have drugs that can prevent the occurrence of hemorrhoids.
- Testing for the Leiden mutation in Factor V is very straightforward for all patients for whom family history suggests an increased risk. For example, if you have someone who is 55 years old, has had a thrombosis in the foot, or if you have an unusual spot (not in the foot), or have another screening test (APC). If you have ever had such a thing in the family, and in having a baby, having a larger operation, or taking a birth control pill for the first time, there is one more line to look at. We also have two other mutation tests for thrombosis, but these are far less common. According to some studies, one of the mutations may also be present in the recurrent miscarriage, especially if all members of the pairing chromosome carry a defective gene. A rare but serious fetal developmental disorder, the occurrence of open spine and cerebral cranial deficiency, cerebrovascular disease, and severe thrombosis may be associated with elevated blood homocysteine ​​levels. However, carriers of this predisposing mutation can reduce blood homocysteine ​​levels, and thus the risks, by increasing the intake of folic acid (several times the recommended daily dose). Your home doctor or specialist may recommend these examinations after thorough review and evaluation of your patient history, but if there are no known risk factors, it is not advisable to do so.
Specialist: dr. Fodor Flurra Clinical Molecular Genetic Forensic DNA Specialist


  1. Aescby

    An intelligible answer

  2. Zulkigami

    Congratulations, I think this is a great idea

  3. Kono

    And how to understand it

  4. Aescwine

    Better late, than never.

  5. Yigil

    It is a pity, that now I can not express - I am late for a meeting. I will return - I will necessarily express the opinion on this question.

  6. Zulukinos

    It is remarkable, rather amusing information

  7. Kajir

    This is a good idea. I support you.

Write a message